|
Written by Edu-factory collective
|
|
Saturday, 01 March 2008 |
|
Dear all, The edu-factory collective would like to thank all participants in this second round of discussion. This has been an extremely rich cycle of debate with important contributions on the questions of labour hierarchisation, differential inclusion and the construction of autonomous education initiatives. As we now propose to close this second round of discussion, we would like to reflect on some of the main areas of controversy but, more importantly, indicate some ways in which the edu-factory project might move ahead in practical and political ways. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Rete per l'Autoformazione_Uniriot Roma
|
|
Monday, 18 February 2008 |
|
1) We need to rethink the issue of the network. Within the social movements over the past few years, everyone agrees that the new form of organization is network organization. This is fine, but it isn’t enough. In fact, today we see liberal economists and scholars exalt the same characteristics that social movements pointed to in a subversive way: the excess of cooperation in market logic, the importance of sharing, the value of differences and multiplicity, the construction of public space, open-source and free software experiences. In other words, most of these people are aware of the impossibility of organizing social cooperation upstream: so, their crucial problem is how to capture it downstream. This is the meaning of the hierarchization and segmentation processes: they must continuously reduce social cooperation to economic value and impose command upon it _post festum_. Also governance is a form of network organization, to use the words of Ned Rossiter: it is based on the impossibility of the classical form of vertical government. In other words, it is based on the crisis determined by the struggles and living labor movements. Governance is decentralized, but it isn’t horizontal. In fact, there aren’t horizontal networks. To summarize: the network is not in itself subversive; it can only be so if linked with the questions of the re-appropriation of the public and the breakdown of capitalistic command and hierarchies. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Radical Education
|
|
Sunday, 10 February 2008 |
|
Radical Education (http://radical.temp.si) discussing alternative education with Mehmet Behluli and Dren Maliqi of the School of Missing Identity and Rizoma / Prishtina, Kosovo
Just when we were finishing this interview we received news from Belgrade that the work of Dren Maliqi titled “Face to Face”, shown at the group exhibition of younger generation of artists from Prishtina, was destroyed by an ultra-nationalist group and the exhibition was consequently closed. Promoting the emancipatory practices in the fields of arts, education, and critical theory the following conversation should be considered as an act of solidarity and an open call to demand a reopening of the exhibition. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Vidya Ashram
|
|
Wednesday, 06 February 2008 |
|
Knowledge Against Society
Twentieth century has been a century of knowledge
production. It has also been a century of unprecedented violence. The knowledge
that we produce is eventually turned against ourselves and against the whole
society. While this was also true of the modern university, knowledge society
that is in the making now seems to be singularly designed to appropriate
knowledge and turn it against the producers of knowledge in the service of
global capital and global machineries of violence.
The university in the modern era was the prime location of
knowledge production, which claimed to take society out of the darkness of
ignorance into enlightenment and from a regime of scarcity to a condition of
abundance. While the university did produce a great deal of knowledge the
motion of this knowledge was such that it ended up being a handmaiden of profit
and domination. On account of its' sole authority in knowledge production, the
university became complicit in suppression of society's knowledge. The bargain
that the university made offered a space of pure enquiry, of knowledge for
knowledge's sake, of pursuit of knowledge without interference from power. The
university defended this privilege as much as it could. Now this privilege is
being withdrawn.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 7 of 19 |